J.F.K: Tricky
Is this 100% true?
Less than 50% true?
If 70 % true, then is the other 30% toxic or just delusional?
Versions: J.F.K.

I read the O’Reilly book a few years ago. Kennedy’s Last Days is standard narrative and does not present any rebuttal to the mainstream “lone gunman” theory. I have to say it is beautifully printed: quality paper, hi-def photos, attractive layout with well-spaced type that is easy on the eyes, but it is written at a 6th-grade level. It’s a good intro to the (discredited) Warren Report narrative for middle or high-schoolers.
I am partway through the Prouty book. It is far more dense and focuses on background details in the years leading up to JFK’s assassination. It has a foreword by Oliver Stone which is very thought-provoking. Prouty was involved in decision-making for the Vietnam War and he knows the subject well. He offers a very different take on it than Bill O, who probably had his ghost-writer package info from the internet for him.
I challenge you to read them both and then tell me where YOU think U.S. tax dollars go after they skim off billions for the spooks at Langley VA.
GETS GOOD @ 6:45 ↓
Chapter One
The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao.
The name that can be named is not the eternal name.
The nameless is the beginning of heaven and Earth.
The named is the mother of the ten thousand things.
Ever desireless, one can see the mystery.
Ever desiring, one sees the manifestations.
These two spring from the same source but differ in name;
this appears as darkness.
Darkness within darkness.
The gate to all mystery.