Also Sprach Scriptaculums

Good poems have changed the world – and the poems can even today. A poem can be expressed differently, is often more accurate than everyday words and comes with excellent sound directly into the heart and soul. Think with the poet captured the love poem to a woman and hit the bow of the topics love about happiness to sadness. Even if the voice fails, the right poem can take on the task of the embassy.

But fortunately enough, most events in life are cheerful nature or you can give them with the matching poem a humorous appeal. New poems we have written exactly that! From the high-class speech as a poem, short poems with punch and imagination and telling little stories as a poem, and more. Our poems and sayings are written in the correct meter and can speak and understand well. Did you know that a poem is really good only while reading aloud ? Then the language opens up more clearly, as well as the emphasis and the sound of words, the results only from rhymed lines. Give it a try ! It opens up to you a new world of poetry ! And not only that, because you feel the class of a sophisticated poem on a word choice that is more than just a tedious rhyme at the end of the line. In a good poem, the words of a line swing in another when speaking with very melodic. The most common and recurring events are birthdays. The theme of the birthday poems we have paid special attention.

And so we, the authors of the Scriptaculums, always try to keep it in the words of Heinrich Heine ( poet 1797-1856 ), who wrote about the art of poetry and poetry follows, quote:

“A bit of foolishness that sees itself always heard to poetry !”

And also Christian Friedrich Hebbel ( 1813-63 poet ) was us a mental model of his sentence, quote:

“Poetry is not to say anything, but to let us dream of it.”

from: SCRIPTACULUM

(with help from Google translator)

The Prerequisites of Poetry

For the past hundred years or so, poetry — like many of the other arts — has been at war with itself. The rejection of historical models for new forms (what the art critic Robert Hughes refers to as the “shock of the new”) has left many readers confused. The rejection of rhyme for free verse, the oral tradition for concrete poetry, the tactile oeuvre for performance art… Each step forward baffles, and disconcerts the uninitiated in the audience. To those not “up” with the latest styles, it all seems more like hijinks than high art.

So here we stand — artists and audience — on either side of the chasm. The artists sneering at the “popular” audience, as a preemptive attack against their likely response. And the audience poo-pooing the artists as haughty and incomprehensible, for making them feel uninformed.

 Andrew Gent @ INCREDIBLY DULL: read full post HERE 

Body vs. Antibody

“There is one Tradition, one Body (made of actual works that comprise a recognized canon) and not two. We can see this logically: there is one universe and we can divide the universe up in any number of ways without violating the idea of one universe, and so, without quibbling about the fluctuating content of the Tradition, we acknowledge with simple logic the Tradition as definitionally one.

Waiting impatiently in the wings, of course, is the “other” tradition, waiting for its moment on stage, the anti-tradition, the new tradition, the different tradition, etc, etc, the inevitable shadow  to the body.”

These words from Scarriet refer to the antagonistic dynamic between the accepted poetic canon opposed by subversive, deconstructive Modernity in poetry.
But they also perfectly describe the relationship between *orthodox Christianity (the True Church which is the Body of Christ) and the Gnostic/Mystic/New Age/Liberationist interpretations which seek to subvert and redefine orthodox doctrine).

*By “Orthodox” I mean what most Christians across all denominations can agree on concerning essentials of the faith.