
Ah, there are so many things between heaven and earth of which only the poets have dreamed! And especially above the heavens: for all gods are poet-symbolisations, poet-sophistications! Truly, ever are we drawn aloft – that is, to the realm of the clouds: on these do we set our gaudy puppets, and then call them gods and Supermen: Are not they light enough for those chairs! – all these gods and Supermen? Ah, how I am weary of all the inadequate that is insisted on as actual! Ah, how I am weary of the poets! When Zarathustra so spoke, his disciple resented it, but was silent. And Zarathustra also was silent; and his eye directed itself inwardly, as if it gazed into the far distance. At last he sighed and drew breath. I am of today and heretofore, said he thereupon; but something is in me that is of the morrow, and the day following, and the hereafter. I became weary of the poets, of the old and of the new: superficial are they all to me, and shallow seas. They did not think sufficiently into the depth; therefore their feeling did not reach to the bottom.
God bless the lying poets, they protect us from those so prideful, they think they own the truth.
LikeLike
Fred N. is interesting – but I do take his lyrical ranting with a large dose of salt. As a Christian, I almost feel guilty for liking his philosophy so much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL, I wrote a post a while back about romancing Fred. I really do like him and he came very close to actually reasoning his way to the existence of God, but missed it a few times. He was a smart man who dared to think, and that’s always a good thing ;)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. Well-said IB. I think his anti-Christian (anti- churchianity ?) streak was, like Kierkegaard’s, due to the dead formalism of the Church in Northern Europe. (Fred’s dad was a Lutheran pastor.)
I read Zarathustra for the poetry and the lyricism more than anything else.
LikeLiked by 1 person